Case Study • NYU Langone

Rebuilding Patient Activation Flow

As NYU Langone launched telemedicine, only 15% of were completing the account creation flow. I redesigned the flow with clearer guidance, inclusive language, and proactive error handling—improving completion rates and enabling telemedicine at scale.

0→1 Healthcare Regulated Workflows Design Systems Accessibility
Role
Senior Product Designer (Lead)
Team
Design • Eng • PM • Compliance • Translation
Timeline
12 weeks discovery→design
Scope
Research • IA • Forms • Email • WCAG AA
Activation flow overview

Problem

Activation was the first touchpoint—and it was failing. Only ~15% of activation visits created accounts. Patients got stuck at validation and treat the verification email like a receipt.

63%
Patient validation
Unclear requirements; form errors.
82%
Email verification
“Thank you” implied done; weak CTA.
10%
Account creation
Late rules; repeated retries.
Clear steps, clear feedback, and clear communication are non-negotiable in healthcare—uncertainty drives abandonment.

What we wanted to learn

Research goals

  • Pinpoint friction across the activation journey (validation → verification → creation).
  • Compare comprehension and effort on mobile vs. desktop.
  • Clarify mental model of “activation” and expected next steps.
  • Evaluate copy, labels, and rationale for data requests.
  • Understand why verification emails are ignored.

Participants (sample)

  • 8 current patients (EN/ES)
  • Age 20s–40s, mixed devices
  • Varied tech literacy
  • Across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens

Presented here as a compact summary to prioritize readability over a full table on mobile.

User scenarios (study prompts)

Scenario A

You booked an appointment and heard the NYU Langone app helps manage care. Activate your account and sign in on your phone.

Scenario B

After booking online, you notice “Sign up for MyChart.” Create your account and confirm your email to access visit details.

What we learned

Observations

  • “Check” icon + “Thank you” subject implied completion before verification.
  • No progress indicator; patients felt “blind” to how many steps remained.
  • Username/password rules surfaced only after errors → retries.

Insights

  • Language mismatch: “create” vs. “activate”.
  • Error copy must instruct how to fix, not just flag a problem.
  • Prevent errors proactively with rules, hints, and defaults.
Biggest issue is forgetting the password because different validation rules.
I’m confused about create vs activate.
I thought I was done because the email starts with Thank You.

Our plan

Reduce cognitive load and ambiguity by making activation visibly guided, language-clear, and error-preventive.

What we set out to do

  • Introduce a three-step tracker (Find Record → Verify → Activate).
  • Rewrite copy for purpose + next step clarity.
  • Show credential rules before input; inline validation/hints.
  • Revise email: clear subject/CTA (“Confirm your account”).
  • Support SMS verification and mobile-first forms.

Why it mattered

  • Activation is the entry point to care—trust begins here.
  • Telemedicine adoption depends on seamless first-use.
  • Lower support burden via self-evident workflows.

Challenges

  • Legacy systems: Epic/MyChart logic constraints.
  • Complex workflows: Patient record matching, identity verification, security.
  • Regulation: Accessibility, privacy, translation parity (EN/ES).

Solutions

Thesis: Reduce cognitive load and ambiguity by making activation visibly guided, language-clear, and error-preventive.

UX copy guidelines artifacts

A more guided experience

step tracker, preventing errors with more help text, more instructive language.

UX copy guidelines artifacts

More inclusive and accessible communication design

Clearer, more direct and accessible language and icons to help people understand their status, objective and what they need to do.

Owned, improved and implemented new form comoponent library and documentation.

Elevated flows across organization by improving forms component librarie, from account creation for myChart to scheduling a doctor's visit.

UX copy guidelines artifacts

Led UX Writing Guidelines

Worked across teams to standarize accessible language, clear formatting and a helpful voice.

Activation flow overview
Activation flow overview

Key improvements

Guided progress

Three-step tracker and page-top guidance eliminate the “blind” feeling; expectations are explicit.

Proactive prevention

Rules, hints, and inline validation appear before input; copy becomes instruction, not admonition.

Stronger handoff

Email subject/CTA rewritten to emphasize confirm and why it matters; fewer users stranded between systems.

Impact

Higher completion
Activation success improved markedly after launch; verification clicks increased with new email subject/CTA.
Design system adoption
Form + copy patterns integrated into the DS and reused across patient access workflows.
Resilience in COVID
The improved activation and standardized components supported rapid telemedicine scale-up during COVID.

Reflections

  • In regulated workflows, predictability is a usability feature—guidance must be visible and consistent.
  • Systemized forms + copy turn one win into many; DS integration multiplies impact.
  • Designing around Epic/MyChart constraints meant focusing on language, sequence, and verification clarity.